September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
The costs of visual working memory
Author Affiliations
  • Alan Robinson
    Dept. of Cognitive Science, UC San Diego
  • Alberto Manzi
    Dept. of Psychology, Second University of Naples
  • Jochen Triesch
    Dept. of Cognitive Science, UC San Diego
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 1069. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alan Robinson, Alberto Manzi, Jochen Triesch; The costs of visual working memory. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):1069.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

While the capacity of visual working memory has been extensively characterized, little work has investigated how occupying visual memory influences cognition and perception. Here we show a novel effect: maintaining an item in visual working memory slows processing of visual input during the maintenance period.

We measured the speed at which subjects could determine the gender of human faces in a dual task paradigm. For the memory task subjects memorized computer generated faces or abstract 3D objects, and then after a 4 second delay, determined if an image was the same or different as the one memorized earlier. For the gender task subjects reported the gender of hairless human faces. The two were combined by inserting the gender task into the delay portion of the memory task. The question was how speed on the gender task would change as a function of the surrounding memory task. In EXPERIMENT 1 gender recognition was slower when another human face had to be maintained in memory than when an abstract 3D object was maintained in memory. In EXPERIMENT 2 we verified that this effect was due to visual memory usage by adding a phonological loop interference task to prevent subjects from using any verbal encoding.

We interpret this effect as interference between memory and perception, caused by the visual similarity between ongoing perceptual input and items already encoded in visual memory. This interference is likely due to a neural overlap in the areas that recognize faces, and the areas that maintain faces in working memory. Thus, using visual memory has perceptual costs, which may explain the limited use of working memory found in research on natural tasks. Thus, everyday behavior may involve a complex trade-off between memory usage and efficient perception.

Robinson, A. Manzi, A. Triesch, J. (2005). The costs of visual working memory [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):1069, 1069a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.1069. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.