September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Both accuracy and response times vary depending on target location in a sustained attention task
Author Affiliations
  • Robin E. Hauck
    Schepens Eye Research Institute
  • Scott J. Gustas
    Schepens Eye Research Institute
  • Matthew A. Leary
    Northeastern University
  • Elisabeth M. Fine
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, and Harvard Medical School
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 160. doi:10.1167/5.8.160
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robin E. Hauck, Scott J. Gustas, Matthew A. Leary, Elisabeth M. Fine; Both accuracy and response times vary depending on target location in a sustained attention task. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):160. doi: 10.1167/5.8.160.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose. In a transient attention task, Carrasco et al. (2004; Vision Research) found differences in response time (RT) and cue benefit depending on the position of the target. In a sustained attention task, Mackeben (1999; Spatial Vision) found differences in accuracy depending on position. The current study combines features of these two studies to determine if RTs also show this pattern in a sustained attention task. Methods. Three subjects identified the orientation of an E in a field of figure-8s presented in a circular array 7.5 deg from fixation. Subjects fixated a central dot for 1000 msec. Following this fixation period, a valid cue or no cue was presented for 1000 msec, followed by a delay of 100 or 1000 msec, then the target for 66 to 200 msec. Eye position was monitored with an Arrington Viewpoint® eyetracker. Trials on which the eyes moved more than ±1 deg were recycled. Cue and no cue conditions were blocked. In each block stimuli were presented 16 times at each position. Results. RTs were slower on the vertical meridian relative to the horizontal meridian (623±162 msec vs. 525±118 msec), and accuracy was reduced (67±15% vs. 93±9%). The data also show a greater cue benefit on the vertical meridian. The cue benefit for RT was 210±112 msec on the vertical meridian and 122±98 msec on the horizontal meridian. The cue benefit for accuracy was 21±16% on the vertical meridian and 6±12% on the horizontal meridian. Conclusions. The data show faster RTs and greater accuracy on the horizontal meridian in both cued and non-cued conditions. However, the effect of the cue was greater on the vertical meridian. These results replicate the differential performance fields found by Mackeben, and extend the RT asymmetries and cue benefits found by Carrasco et al. to a sustained attention task.

Hauck, R. E. Gustas, S. J. Leary, M. A. Fine, E. M. (2005). Both accuracy and response times vary depending on target location in a sustained attention task [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):160, 160a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.160. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.