Purchase this article with an account.
Donald J. Kalar, Patrick Garrigan, Philip J. Kellman; Second-order contour discontinuities in segmentation and shape representation. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.212.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
Previously, we reported efforts to better define good continuation as the principle governing perception of unity, separateness, and parts in continuous contours. That work showed that the presence of first-order (tangent) discontinuities primarily governed segmentation (Kellman, Garrigan, Kalar & Shipley, 2003). Here we report subsequent efforts to determine whether second-order discontinuities (locations at which the contour's second-derivative is undefined) play a role in segmentation and grouping. Using our earlier paradigm, in which subjects searched in noise for a contour segment with varying levels of continuity to other segments, we found no reliable sensitivity to second-order discontinuities as a basis for segmentation.
Other research has suggested that second-order discontinuities are features, and can lead to “pop-out” in a search paradigm (Kristjansson & Tse, 2001). These and other results have been interpreted as implicating second-order discontinuities in contour shape representation and segmentation. We replicated the visual search findings of Kristjansson & Tse (2001), and then showed with additional manipulations that second-order discontinuities alone do not account for their previous findings. Displays containing even more second-order discontinuities but with a less-noticeable difference in symmetry from ellipses showed serial, not parallel search patterns. We explore alternative hypotheses that may explain both sets of data.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only