September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Temporal properties of brightness induction
Author Affiliations
  • Mark E. McCourt
    Center for Visual Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
  • Barbara Blakeslee
    Center for Visual Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
  • Wren Pasieka
    Center for Visual Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 242. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mark E. McCourt, Barbara Blakeslee, Wren Pasieka; Temporal properties of brightness induction. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):242. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The brightness of a target depends on its surround, which exerts influence through lateral interactions mediated by interneurons: A time lag is introduced between the registration of the surround and its effect on target brightness. DeValois et al. (1986, Vision Research, 26, 887–897) used a matching technique and found that induced brightness modulations existed only at temporal frequencies below 2.5 Hz. Paradiso & Nakayama (1991, Vision Research, 31 1221–1236) and Rossi & Paradiso (1996, Vision Research, 36, 1391–1398) suggested that brightness percepts are determined by a “fill-in” process whose signals propagate at 110–150°/sec (6.7–9.2 ms/degree). We sinusoidally counterphased the inducing grating of a grating induction display (McCourt, 1982, Vision Research, 22, 119–134) to create a counterphasing induced grating within the test field. Adding a second (luminance) counterphasing grating in temporal and spatial quadrature phase to the induced grating transforms the brightness modulation into a traveling wave (motion). Varying the temporal phase of the added luminance grating permits a precise estimate of the temporal phase lag of induction. Results indicate that induction lag is remarkably short, on the order of a few milliseconds, and does not vary with inducing field height in a manner that suggests the operation of a fill-in process.

McCourt, M. E. Blakeslee, B. Pasieka, W. (2005). Temporal properties of brightness induction [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):242, 242a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.242. [CrossRef]
 Supported by NIH EY014015-01, RR020151-01 and NSF IBN-0212798

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.