September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Simple stimulus metrics vs. Gestalt in high-level aftereffects
Author Affiliations
  • Kai-Markus Müller
    National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda MD, and Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, TübingenGermany
  • Marc O. Ernst
    Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, TübingenGermany
  • David A. Leopold
    National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda MD
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 250. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kai-Markus Müller, Marc O. Ernst, David A. Leopold; Simple stimulus metrics vs. Gestalt in high-level aftereffects. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):250.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

High-level visual aftereffects (AEs) arise when adaptation to stimuli such as shapes, faces, or spatial configurations affect the subsequent perception of comparable figures. Like classical AEs, high-level AEs are characterized by a percept that is distorted in feature space in the opposite direction of the vector between adaptation and test stimulus. Shape-contrast AEs have been reported for aspect ratio, convexity and taper, but the combined effect of such parameters remained unexplored. In the present experiment the adapting stimulus consisted of two arcs. While keeping the flexion of the arcs constant we varied the distance between them in a range of ±8.2°, allowing us to examine the effects of (1) aspect ratio and (2) convexity/concavity. The test stimulus was a closed ellipsoid of about 7.8° in diameter. Perceptual distortions were assessed with repetitive adaptation and testing in the context of a staircase procedure converging to the point of subjective circularity. We found significant main effects for both factors and the interaction, i.e. smaller aspect ratios lead to stronger effects and convex stimuli result in larger effects than concave ones. The direct spatial correspondence between the location of the adapting and test stimulus was not critical for inducing an AE. We repeated the experiment with a set of smaller stimuli of roughly 1° and the distance between the curves scaled down proportionately. Results in both experiments were comparable, although the interaction was not significant in experiment 2. The results suggest that simple stimulus metrics, such as the absolute size of the curves and distance between them, are less important in creating this AE than the overall shape created by the pair of arcs together.

Müller, K.-M. Ernst, M. O. Leopold, D. A. (2005). Simple stimulus metrics vs. Gestalt in high-level aftereffects [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):250, 250a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.250. [CrossRef]
 This work was supported by the Max-Planck Society and the National Institute of Mental Health

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.