September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Modeling lateral interaction in fine spatial discriminations: The plot thickens
Author Affiliations
  • Lynn A. Olzak
    Department of Psychology, Miami University of Ohio
  • Scott H. Gabree
    Department of Psychology, Miami University of Ohio
  • Pentti I. Laurinen
    Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 476. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lynn A. Olzak, Scott H. Gabree, Pentti I. Laurinen; Modeling lateral interaction in fine spatial discriminations: The plot thickens. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):476.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A patterned annulus that fails to activate a cell on its own may reduce activity when the cell is excited by a center patterned disc. Most models assume lateral interactions among low-level mechanisms (pooled gain control) are responsible, and psychophysical models further assume that the interactions are reciprocal between center and surround. To complicate these simple models, there is some physiological evidence that the apparent size of a cell's excitatory zone is not fixed; it appears to decrease with increasing contrast. Here, we a) tested the reciprocity assumption for fine spatial discriminations and b) psychophysically measured summation areas at three contrast levels. In both experiments, observers discriminated between two highly similar grating patches (4 cpd) in each block of eighty trials. Half discriminated on the basis of orientation; half on spatial frequency. Each condition of each experiment was run in a separate session, using a signal detection rating paradigm, and was replicated five times following extensive practice and individual determination of “threshold” (d'=1.5). In the reciprocity experiments, observers made decisions either on a center circular patch of grating with and without an annular masking surround or on an annular surround ring with and without a center masking disk. Four test/mask size ratios and six contrasts were used. In the summation experiment, discrimination performance was measured for center discs alone as a function of size (5 levels) and contrast (3 levels). We confirmed that summation areas decreased with increasing contrast when measured psychophysically. Furthermore, interactions were not reciprocal. Surrounds masked centers, but centers had no effect on surrounds. These results imply that current psychophysical models of lateral interactions are too simple, and that mechanisms of figure-ground organization may play in role in mediating these lateral interactions.

Olzak, L. A. Gabree, S. H. Laurinen, P. I. (2005). Modeling lateral interaction in fine spatial discriminations: The plot thickens [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):476, 476a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.476. [CrossRef]
 This research was supported by NIH Grant EY13953

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.