September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Can target selection for saccades use separate foci of attention in the two hemispheres?
Author Affiliations
  • Josh Wallman
    Department of Biology, City College, City Univ. of New York
  • Laurent Madelain
    Department of Psychology, University of Lille, France
  • Rich Krauzlis
    Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Research, La Jolla, California
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 695. doi:10.1167/5.8.695
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Josh Wallman, Laurent Madelain, Rich Krauzlis; Can target selection for saccades use separate foci of attention in the two hemispheres?. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):695. doi: 10.1167/5.8.695.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It is widely held that the targets of saccades (and perhaps of attention as well) are typically selected by a winner-take-all mechanism in which maximal neural activity on some brain map (perhaps in the superior colliculus or frontal eye field) converges on one location, inhibiting other locations. If circumstances permitted the brain regions in each hemisphere to separately process the candidate stimuli, might target selection for saccades occur more efficiently than if the alternatives were processed within the same hemisphere? In humans, there is some evidence that attention can be more easily split between the right and left hemifields than between two locations in the same hemifield (Sereno & Kosslyn, 1991; Awh & Pashler, 2000; McMains & Somers, 2004). We asked whether saccadic reaction times showed evidence of separate foci of attention.

Subjects were instructed to attend to two 5-deg stimulus patches 10 deg apart, and to make a saccade to the one that changed. The stimuli were a rotating colored grating, which changed from smooth rotation to rotation in 16 equal-angle steps, and a field of dots moving randomly, in which the lifetime of each dot changed from 75 msec to 375 msec. In different experimental blocks the two stimuli were the same or different, and were either located 3 deg below the fixation point, one to the left and one to the right, or 3 deg to the right of the fixation point, one above and one below. Across three subjects and four stimulus conditions, saccade latencies were shorter in 11 of 12 cases if the two stimulus patches were in opposite hemifields than if both stimuli were in the same hemifield, regardless of the nature of the stimuli (mean difference, 74 msec). This suggests that more attentional resources can be allocated to two locations if they are in different hemifields than if they are in the same hemifield.

Wallman, J. Madelain, L. Krauzlis, R. (2005). Can target selection for saccades use separate foci of attention in the two hemispheres? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):695, 695a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.695. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.