September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Paying attention to orientation: A two-stage framework of familiar object recognition
Author Affiliations
  • Irina M. Harris
    University of Sydney, Australia
  • Paul E. Dux
    Vanderbilt University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.746
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Irina M. Harris, Paul E. Dux; Paying attention to orientation: A two-stage framework of familiar object recognition. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):746. https://doi.org/10.1167/5.8.746.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recognition costs incurred by rotated objects have usually been interpreted as evidence for viewpoint-dependent recognition. However, recent findings from repetition blindness and attentional blink experiments (Harris & Dux, in press; Dux & Harris, VSS 2004) suggest that initial recognition is actually mediated by orientation-invariant representations and that the orientation effects arise during a later stage of processing which enables conscious recognition and report. We detail a two-stage framework of familiar object recognition which accounts for these results and other findings in the object recognition literature. In stage 1, the object's identity is recovered from memory via an orientation-invariant representation. However, before the object can be consolidated, a second attention-demanding stage of processing is required, in which the object's identity and its orientation at a particular moment are integrated, in order to give rise to a conscious percept anchored in space and time. According to the model, orientation effects on recognition arise during the second stage, because of a discrepancy between the spatial orientation of the stimulus and the expected orientation retrieved from memory. This discrepancy has to be resolved before an episodic representation of the object can be consolidated and reported.

Harris, I. M. Dux, P. E. (2005). Paying attention to orientation: A two-stage framework of familiar object recognition [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):746, 746a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/746/, doi:10.1167/5.8.746. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Funded by ARC grant DP0211342
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×