September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Touch-induced visual illusion
Author Affiliations
  • Artem Violentyev
    Psychology Dept., University of California Los Angeles
  • Shinsuke Shimojo
    Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology
  • Ladan Shams
    Psychology Dept., University of California Los Angeles
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 754. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Artem Violentyev, Shinsuke Shimojo, Ladan Shams; Touch-induced visual illusion. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):754.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Although vision is considered the dominant modality, recent studies demonstrate the influence of other modalities on visual perception (Shams et al. 2000, Sekuler et al., 1999, Ernst et al., 2000). We report an extension of the “sound-induced flash illusion,” (Shams et al., 2000) to the tactile-visual domain, yielding the “touch-induced flash illusion.” Methods: Visual stimulus consisted of a uniform grey disk presented at 7 degree eccentricity below the fixation point for 10 ms. Tactile stimulation was provided by a refreshable Braille cell consisting of a 2×4 array of plastic pins which were raised simultaneously for 34 ms and provided a salient stimulation to the tip of the left index finger. A factorial design was used with two factors: the number of flashes (1 or 2), and number of taps (0, 1, 2). Thirty trials of each condition were presented in random order to nine naïve subjects. The task was to judge the number of flashes seen on the screen. Results: On average, observers reported seeing two flashes on 63% of trials when a single flash was accompanied by two taps, compared to 15% of trials when it was presented in the absence of taps. Furthermore, signal detection theory analysis indicated that double taps caused a change in sensitivity in visual discrimination. This radical change in perception was consistent across all subjects tested. Conclusion: These findings provide further evidence challenging the notion that visual perception is independent of activity in other modalities.

Violentyev, A. Shimojo, S. Shams, L. (2005). Touch-induced visual illusion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):754, 754a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.754. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.