September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Form and motion processing in dyslexia
Author Affiliations
  • Justin M. O'Brien
    Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
  • Janine V. Spencer
    Centre for Research in Infant Behaviour, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
  • Stella Tsermentseli
    Centre for Cognition and Neuroimaging, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 850. doi:10.1167/5.8.850
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Justin M. O'Brien, Janine V. Spencer, Stella Tsermentseli; Form and motion processing in dyslexia. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):850. doi: 10.1167/5.8.850.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

We report a study of motion-coherence and form-coherence in dyslexia using psychophysics and fMRI. Deficits in perceiving coherent motion have been reported in dyslexia, but no differences in form coherence have previously been found. We measured form and motion thresholds for detecting a Glass stimulus of varying coherence in a field of random dots. A coherent visual patch was depicted by dots separated by a rotational transformation in space (form coherence) or space-time (motion coherence). Stimuli were presented for 0.25s to prevent serial search strategies. Coherence was progressively reduced from 1.0 until an error was made, in the manner of a 2-up, 1-down staircase, with thresholds calculated as the mean of 6 reversals, ignoring 2 initial reversals. Motion coherence thresholds were higher in dyslexic participants than controls, replicating previous findings. Form coherence thresholds were also significantly higher in the dyslexic population, however, indicating a parvo- or ventral stream deficit. In a parallel event-related fMRI study in which participants performed the same task in the scanner at fixed coherence levels (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0), BOLD responses indicated a variable but non-linear relationship with motion coherence in V5/MT for dyslexic participants, compared to the linear response in controls which was consistent with previous studies (Rees et al, 2000 Nature Neuroscience 3 716–723). No significant difference was found between dyslexics and controls in the relationship between BOLD response and form coherence in any of the four occipital regions of interest.

O'Brien, J. M. Spencer, J. V. Tsermentseli, S. (2005). Form and motion processing in dyslexia [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):850, 850a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.850. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.