September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Neurophysiological changes in the visual cortex after cochlear implantation
Author Affiliations
  • Marie-Eve Doucet
    Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
  • François Bergeron
    Université Laval, Québec, Canada
  • Franco Lepore
    Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 886. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marie-Eve Doucet, François Bergeron, Franco Lepore; Neurophysiological changes in the visual cortex after cochlear implantation. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):886. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Using visual evoked potentials (VEP), the cortical network engaged by apparent motion in the central and peripheral visual field in twenty subjects with normal hearing was compared with that in five patients who received a cochlear implant (CI) after a period of profound deafness. All the patients wore the CI for two years, but they did not react in the same manner to the reintroduction of the auditory input. The three first patients (SL, SB and JFR) quickly learned to use the device whereas the fourth patient (JD) resigned after having attempted unsuccessfully for a full year, and the fifth (JME) and the sixth (JSG) patients had mitigated success using the CI. The visual evoked potentials of the three most successful CI users showed supranormal amplitudes in their VEP but only after the CI implantation; the waveforms of the other CI users did not strikingly differ from those of the control participants. These results are interpreted and discussed in terms of intermodal plasticity.

Doucet, M.-E. Bergeron, F. Lepore, F. (2005). Neurophysiological changes in the visual cortex after cochlear implantation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):886, 886a,, doi:10.1167/5.8.886. [CrossRef]
 This research was supported by grants from the FRSQ, CRSNG and IRSC.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.