June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Is statistical learning theory applicable to the human brain?
Author Affiliations
  • Monica Padilla
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Center for Vision Science and Technology
  • Norberto M. Grzywacz
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Center for Vision Science and Technology, and Neuroscience Program
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.166
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Monica Padilla, Norberto M. Grzywacz; Is statistical learning theory applicable to the human brain?. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):166. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.166.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Methods of machine learning, especially from Statistical Learning Theory (SLT), yield excellent results. We wondered to what extent these theoretical tools are applicable to human Perceptual Learning (PL). Standard SLT (Vapnik, 2000), allows learning of the optimal decision rule, without learning the input information (data). We show two examples where the human brain can learn without learning the decision rule. First, we trained subjects in a 2AFC homogeneous-versus-non-homogeneous motion task with 34 segments. After extensive training, subjects couldn't perform the task. Hence, they never learned the optimal decision rule. However, training resulted in significant improvement for tasks with two segments. In the second example, subjects trained and learned a homogeneous-versus-non-homogeneous task with varying edge position across stimuli. Improvement in a Vernier task using a similar display was also seen. The two tasks have different optimal decision rules, that if learned should result in improvement of the Vernier task with further training, which is not the case.

In conclusion, mechanisms of PL in humans do not follow standard SLT. They involve forms of learning that are not limited to the optimization of the decision rule. Our data suggest that the brain may be learning the statistics of the input information, which allow improved performance in tasks different from the ones trained on. Alternatively, the brain may be tuning its noisy processing stages to deal with the inputs, regardless of the decisions. We have proposed a generalization of SLT that allows for these alternative forms of learning (Grzywacz and Padilla, 2006).

Padilla, M. Grzywacz, N. M. (2006). Is statistical learning theory applicable to the human brain? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):166, 166a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/166/, doi:10.1167/6.6.166. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.