June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Local 3D shape and reflectance statistics of natural surfaces
Author Affiliations
  • Richard F. Murray
    Center for Vision Research, York University
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.263
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Richard F. Murray; Local 3D shape and reflectance statistics of natural surfaces. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):263. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.263.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Shape from shading is an under-constrained problem, so in order to perceive 3D object shape from image shading, observers must make assumptions about what surface shape and reflectance patterns are likely or unlikely. We examined some statistical properties of natural surfaces. METHOD. We measured selected statistical properties of 3D digital scans of fifty-five randomly selected objects. The data was provided by Arius3D, Inc. The scans included naturally occurring objects and man-made objects. We viewed each virtual object through a 256 × 256 pixel virtual camera. The objects were rotated to a random orientation, and scaled so that they spanned the image matrix. Because these were virtual objects, it was possible to determine the orientation and reflectance of the 3D surface patch that corresponded to each pixel, and thus to examine how 3D surface properties changed from pixel to pixel of the 2D image. RESULTS. (a) Changes in surface orientation from pixel to pixel followed a well-defined distribution, with peaks at 0° and 5°, and a smaller peak at 90°. (b) Changes in surface reflectance from pixel to pixel also followed a well-defined distribution, with a sharp peak at zero change, and a rapid falloff at higher changes. (c) Changes in orientation were more likely than corresponding changes in reflectance, which may explain why we generally perceive flat images as renderings of 3D scenes. (d) Changes in orientation and reflectance were moderately correlated. It is unknown whether the human visual system exploits this fact when reconstructing 3D shapes from 2D images.

Murray, R. F. (2006). Local 3D shape and reflectance statistics of natural surfaces [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):263, 263a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/263/, doi:10.1167/6.6.263. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.