June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Faces and familiarity: Not all fame is the same
Author Affiliations
  • James Intriligator
    University of Wales, Bangor
  • Jennifer Kaltreider
    University of Wales, Bangor
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.274
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      James Intriligator, Jennifer Kaltreider; Faces and familiarity: Not all fame is the same. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):274. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.274.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose. Extremely familiar faces (e.g. one's own face) can be found rapidly in visual search tasks (e.g. Tong and Nakayama, 1999). We now investigate whether similar benefits can be found for faces of other levels of familiarity (for example, moderately famous faces). Stimuli and Procedure. In all conditions, participants searched for a target face among a set of novel distractor faces. A present/absent response was required (targets were present on half the trials). We chose the target faces to include various levels of familiarity (e.g. unknown, familiar, well-known, famous). Half the trials were standard visual search trials and the other half were presented in a novel “overlay condition”. In this condition, each stimulus was presented behind a transparent novel face (40% transparency). This condition, which requires the observer to segregate the two images, was created to put unique demands on the face-recognition system. Results. In our standard search condition, search benefits increased as a function of familiarity. In other words, each increase in familiarity yields additional search benefits. However, in the overlay condition such a quantitative performance increase was not found. In this condition, we found search benefits only for highly familiar faces. Discussion. Task demands determine how familiarity impacts search performance. In some tasks, each increase in target familiarity leads to better performance. But, in other cases, increases in familiarity have little or no effect until the stimuli are extremely familiar. We discuss these results in terms of the mental representations required to facilitate task performance.

Intriligator, J. Kaltreider, J. (2006). Faces and familiarity: Not all fame is the same [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):274, 274a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/274/, doi:10.1167/6.6.274. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.