June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Orientation congruence judgments in faces & words
Author Affiliations
  • Carl M. Gaspar
    McMaster University
  • Patrick J. Bennett
    McMaster University, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
  • Allison B. Sekuler
    McMaster University, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.276
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Carl M. Gaspar, Patrick J. Bennett, Allison B. Sekuler; Orientation congruence judgments in faces & words. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.276.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Thatcher faces - images with eyes and mouth rotated - have a striking appearance. Thatcher and normal faces are easy to tell apart when upright, but not when inverted (Thompson, 1980; Lewis, 2001). These phenomena have been cited as evidence that normal face processing relies on a comparison between parts and wholes, and that these comparisons become less accurate when faces are shown upside-down. However, previous tasks involving the detection of Thatcher faces could be done successfully by attending to only a single facial feature. Here, we introduced uncertainty about which feature could be incongruent, forcing observers to monitor more than a single feature. The second experiment forced observers to make comparisons between parts and wholes by mixing trials of upright and inverted faces; now an upside-down eye could be congruent or incongruent, depending on how the rest of the face was oriented. In addition, we applied the same paradigms to study the perception of part-whole congruence in words. There is evidence that part-whole relationships play a role in word/letter identification (e.g., the word-superiority effect), but no one has studied how observers discriminate normal words from words containing an inverted letter. Both faces and words are familiar categories with canonical orientations. As such, one might expect judgments of orientation congruence to be similar for both categories. Indeed, our results show that congruence judgments are always enhanced by stimuli being presented in their normal orientation. However, our results also suggest that the benefit gained from uprightness differs for words and faces.

Gaspar, C. M. Bennett, P. J. Sekuler, A. B. (2006). Orientation congruence judgments in faces & words [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):276, 276a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/276/, doi:10.1167/6.6.276. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.