June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Components of feature-based attention for object perception
Author Affiliations
  • Bobby Stojanoski
    University of Toronto at carborough, Toronto
  • Matthias Niemeier
    University of Toronto at Scarborough, Toronto, and Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.308
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bobby Stojanoski, Matthias Niemeier; Components of feature-based attention for object perception. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):308. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.308.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Mechanisms of feature-based attention underlie facilitated processing of the attended feature throughout the visual field. We have previously shown this holds with collinearity: we demonstrated that perception of collinear-defined loops was better when attending to other collinear-defined loops rather than attending to motion-defined loops. Our results could provide evidence for high-level feature-based attention. Alternatively, it is possible this advantage was simply due to a low-level effect of symmetry. That is, presenting collinear-defined loops together with other collinear-defined loops created a more symmetrical display than when presented together with motion-defined loops. Here we investigated symmetry as a factor in explaining the effect of feature-based attention. To disrupt symmetrical processing we presented S-shapes together with loops. The experiment used a dual task paradigm, that included two concurrent rapid serial presentation streams of scattered gabors appearing in the left and right visual hemifield. The primary task, indicated by a fixation arrow, presented two S-shapes that were either (a) collinear-defined or (b) motion-defined. Coinciding with one of the two S-shapes was the appearance of the secondary collinear-defined loop. Perceptual thresholds were determined in a two-alternative-forced-interval fashion by manipulating the amount of orientational/rotational noise of the gabors. The results replicated our initial experiment in that attending to collinear-defined objects facilitated the perception of collinearity on the unattended side. These results suggest that symmetry cannot explain the observed effects of feature-based attention. Furthermore, what appears to be important is not the global structure of the object but a specific feature - the collinearity of the object's contour.

Stojanoski, B. Niemeier, M. (2006). Components of feature-based attention for object perception [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):308, 308a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/308/, doi:10.1167/6.6.308. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Funded by CFI and NSERC
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×