June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
On the mechanisms for contour-shape after-effects
Author Affiliations
  • Frederick A. A. Kingdom
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
  • Elena Gheorghiu
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.339
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Frederick A. A. Kingdom, Elena Gheorghiu; On the mechanisms for contour-shape after-effects. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):339. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.339.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Adaptation to a sinusoidally modulated contour produces a shift in the apparent shape frequency of a subsequently presented test contour, in a direction away from that of the adaptation stimulus. The phenomenon has been termed the ‘shape-frequency after-effect’ or SFAE (Kingdom & Prins, 2005, JOV, 5, 464). We describe an even larger after-effect of contour-shape amplitude, which we term the ‘shape-amplitude after-effect’ or SAAE. What underlies these after-effects? They occur even when the shape-phase of the contour is randomly changed every half second during the adaptation period, which would tend to lead one to reject the idea that local tilt (or orientation) after-effects (TAEs) are the underlying cause. However we show that even with adaptation contour phase-randomization, the geometrical relationships between adaptor and test are such that the TAE is difficult to rule out. We provide evidence against the TAE: sizeable after-effects are obtained for adaptors that are sine-wave-shaped and tests that are square-wave-shaped. In addition we test, and reject, three other candidates besides local orientation: global average curvature, local signed curvature and global spatial frequency. We suggest that contour shape after-effects result from adaptation to the sizes of local, partly-bounded regions defined by the contour's shape. This in turn implies that contour shape is processed by mechanisms that encode the sizes of partly-bounded regions of the stimulus.

Kingdom, F. A. A. Gheorghiu, E. (2006). On the mechanisms for contour-shape after-effects [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):339, 339a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/339/, doi:10.1167/6.6.339. [CrossRef]
 Funded by NSERC grant OGP01217130 given to F.K.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.