June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
The distribution of visual attention: Evidence based on temporal order judgment (TOJ) task
Author Affiliations
  • Cesar Galera
    FFCLRP-DPE, University of São Paulo a, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
  • Mikael Cavallet
    FFCLRP-DPE, University of São Paulo a, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
  • Michael von Grünau
    Department of Psychology & CSLP, Concordia University, Montreal, Que, Canada
  • Guilherme Caserta
    FFCLRP-DPE, University of São Paulo a, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
  • Afroditi Panagopoulos
    Department of Psychology & CSLP, Concordia University, Montreal, Que, Canada
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.593
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Cesar Galera, Mikael Cavallet, Michael von Grünau, Guilherme Caserta, Afroditi Panagopoulos; The distribution of visual attention: Evidence based on temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):593. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.593.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: The focus of selective attention can be concentrated in areas with different size and specific shapes. In this study we employed a temporal-order-judgment task (TOJ) to explore the differences in the concentration of attentional resources inside and outside the attended area. Methods: The method of constant stimuli was used in two experiments. Subjects' task was to judge which of two sequential letters (“F” or “J”) was presented first (Experiment 1, 2A) or second (Experiment 2B). Randomly, one of the letters was presented inside an area delimited by a frame, an outlined rectangle (6.4° á 1.1°). On each trial the frame was presented horizontally or vertically around the fixation point for 100 ms. One of the letters was presented inside and the other outside the frame. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the first and second letter varied by 20, 30, 60, 100 and 200 ms. Results:. In Exp. 1 the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) was −43ms when the first letter was presented inside the frame and 35 ms when presented outside. In Exp 2, mean PSS values were −28 ms and 33 ms respectively, and did not differ from zero when the frame was absent. Conclusion: The stimulus presented inside the frame had a clear advantage in relation to the stimulus presented outside, independent of whether the subject judged the stimulus as appearing first or second. The results suggest that attentional resources are more concentrated inside a delimited area than outside it.

Galera, C. Cavallet, M. von Grünau, M. Caserta, G. Panagopoulos, A. (2006). The distribution of visual attention: Evidence based on temporal order judgment (TOJ) task [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):593, 593a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/593/, doi:10.1167/6.6.593. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Capes, CNPq (CG), NSERC, FQRSC (MvG)
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×