June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Shape-shifters: Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations
Author Affiliations
  • Elan Barenholtz
    Brown University Dept. of Cog. and Linguistic Sciences
  • Michael J. Tarr
    Brown University Dept. of Cog. and Linguistic Sciences
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.606
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elan Barenholtz, Michael J. Tarr; Shape-shifters: Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):606. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.606.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A single biological object, such as a hand, can assume multiple, very different shapes, due to the articulation of its parts. Yet we are able to recognize all of these shapes as examples of the same object. How is this invariance to pose achieved? Here, we present evidence that the visual system maintains a model of object transformation that is based on rigid, convex parts articulating at extrema of negative curvature, i.e., part boundaries. We generated pairs of jagged polygonal contours that were identical except for a single ‘part’ (an extruding segment of the contour) that pivoted across the two contours. The two contours - the ‘base’ and ‘transform’ - were both used to divide a polygonal shape into two halves resulting in four closed shapes. Similar to an ‘Attneave egg’ (Attneave, 1971), the figure and ground of the dividing contours was reversed across the two halves of the split shapes; under one figural assignment the difference between the ‘base’ and ‘transform’ contours corresponded to a convex region pivoting at concavities - i.e., a legitimate articulation - while under the other assignment it consisted of a concave ‘hole’ pivoting at convexities. In a 2AFC similarity task, subjects were much more likely to match the base shape to a transform when it corresponded to a legitimate articulation then when it didn't, even though the underlying contour transformations were identical in the two cases. These results suggest that the visual system maintains expectations about the way objects will transform, based on their static geometry.

Barenholtz, E. Tarr, M. J. (2006). Shape-shifters: Visual judgment of similarity across shape transformations [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):606, 606a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/606/, doi:10.1167/6.6.606. [CrossRef]
 Funded by NGA Award #HM1582-04-C-0051

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.