June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
House training: Neural correlates of object learning
Author Affiliations
  • Jesse S. Husk
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Lisa R. Betts
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Kathleen M. O'Craven
    The Rotman Research Institute
  • Patrick J. Bennett
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
  • Allison B. Sekuler
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, & Behaviour, McMaster University, and Centre for Vision Research, York University
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 664. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.664
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jesse S. Husk, Lisa R. Betts, Kathleen M. O'Craven, Patrick J. Bennett, Allison B. Sekuler; House training: Neural correlates of object learning. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):664. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.664.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The Fusiform Face Area (FFA) is associated with stronger BOLD responses to faces than to other objects (Kanwisher et al., 1997). Expertly processed objects also are associated with stronger activity within this region (Gauthier & Tarr, 1997; Gauthier et al., 2000), suggesting the FFA may not be devoted to faces per se, but to within-category discrimination of expertly-learned objects. However, these studies have not addressed the effect of learning on regions beyond the FFA.

Using whole brain imaging, we examined the activity associated with faces, and trained and untrained houses before and after 5 days of training on a 4AFC house-discrimination task. The parahippocampal place area (PPA) responds preferentially to houses and scenes (Epstein & Kanwisher, 1998), so we sought to determine whether training induces a shift in the cortical locations responsive to houses (for example, a shift from PPA to FFA activation), or a change specifically within the PPA.

A partial least squares analysis showed that the data were well described by a contrast of the activity for houses versus faces. The strength of this contrast grew with training, suggesting greater differentiation of faces from houses after training. Despite this global change, a region of interest analysis indicated no significant activity changes within either FFA or PPA.

Together, these results suggest that house training enhances the global patterns of activity differentiating faces from houses, without substantially altering activity within more localized object processing regions.

Husk, J. S. Betts, L. R. O'Craven, K. M. Bennett, P. J. Sekuler, A. B. (2006). House training: Neural correlates of object learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):664, 664a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/664/, doi:10.1167/6.6.664. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This work was supported by NSERC Discovery Grants 42133 and 105494 and Canada Research Chairs to PJB and ABS, and an NSERC PGS-D award to JSH
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×