June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Dissociating microgenesis of retinal and non-retinal adaptation
Author Affiliations
  • Naotsugu Tsuchiya
    Division of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology
  • Lee A. Gilroy
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
  • Randolph Blake
    Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University
  • Christof Koch
    Devision of Biology, California Institute of Technology
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 696. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.696
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Lee A. Gilroy, Randolph Blake, Christof Koch; Dissociating microgenesis of retinal and non-retinal adaptation. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):696. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.696.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Negative afterimages have traditionally been ascribed to retinal adaptation, but recent studies suggest that adaptation mediating afterimage formation occurs at multiple levels of visual processing. Here, we use an interocular suppression technique, called continuous flash suppression (Tsuchiya 05 NatNeuro), to dissociate microgenesis of retinal adaptation (which should be immune to suppression) from non-retinal adaptation (which is susceptible to suppression). We achieve this dissociation by holding retinal adaptation constant at 5 sec while manipulating the duration of suppression. Remarkably, presentation of five, brief flashes during the last 500 msec of adaptation was sufficient to reduce the magnitude of non-retinal adaptation by half. To quantify the strength of suppression, we used a forced-choice probe detection task and found that as few as five successive, brief flashes interfered with probe detection as much as continuous flash suppression. However, a single flash only exerted suppression within a narrow window of time between onset of the probe and onset of the suppression figure; moreover, the suppression from this single flash did not sum its effect when we paired flash suppression with conventional binocular rivalry suppression. This modified flash suppression technique provides a useful method for dissecting adaptation arising within mechanisms at multiple visual processing levels.

Tsuchiya, N. Gilroy, L. A. Blake, R. Koch, C. (2006). Dissociating microgenesis of retinal and non-retinal adaptation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):696, 696a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/696/, doi:10.1167/6.6.696. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Footnotes
 EY13358, NIMH, NSF, the Keck Foundation, the Moore Foundation
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×