June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Lightness constancy in shadows: Evidence for high level inference
Author Affiliations
  • James M. Hillis
    University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology
  • David H. Brainard
    University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.709
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      James M. Hillis, David H. Brainard; Lightness constancy in shadows: Evidence for high level inference. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):709. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.709.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The perceived lightness of a focal stimulus depends on the context in which it is presented. In some cases these effects can be explained parsimoniously in terms of simple adaptive mechanisms, while in other cases such explanations are tenuous. Adelson's checkerboard illusion (http://web.mit.edu/persci/people/adelson/checkershadow_illusion.html) provides an interesting example: two gray squares of identical intensity, one in a shadow and one not, have very different apparent lightness. We performed experiments to determine the nature of the mechanisms underlying this effect. Our working hypothesis is that consistency between context effects revealed by appearance and discrimination data is a signature of early mechanisms, while a dissociation between the two indicates the action of higher-level processes. We have shown that context effects induced by changes of uniform backgrounds (JOSA, 2005) and relatively unstructured contrast are common to both appearance and discrimination.

Ten observers participated. Observers set lightness matches between stimuli presented at two locations in the checkerboard illusion (one in and one out of the shadow). We also measured discrimination thresholds for each observer at the two relevant locations. The same measurements were made for a control configuration where the appearance of shadow was eliminated from the checkerboard. he asymmetric matches revealed a large appearance effect in the illusion configuration, and almost no effect in the control configuration. The threshold measurements were unchanged between illusion and control configurations. In contrast with our results for simple context manipulations, lightness effects revealed by the checkerboard illusion cannot be explained by adaptive processes that mediate discrimination performance.

Hillis, J. M. Brainard, D. H. (2006). Lightness constancy in shadows: Evidence for high level inference [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):709, 709a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/709/, doi:10.1167/6.6.709. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.