June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Is perception of a degraded figure resistant to spatial context at short exposure?
Author Affiliations
  • Michael R. Scheessele
    Indiana University South Bend
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 762. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.762
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael R. Scheessele; Is perception of a degraded figure resistant to spatial context at short exposure?. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):762. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.6.762.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Introduction: When a degraded figure is displayed with short exposure duration, do surrounding visual display elements provide spatial context that influences perception of the figure?

Method: Each stimulus contained a black figure against white ground. Each figure comprised 4 rectangles. White square distractors degraded a figure, while black square distractors served as noise. There were 3 conditions - figures presented with: all small square distractors, all large square distractors, and a third mixed condition. In the mixed condition, the figure was presented within an imaginary window (larger than the figure yet smaller than the image). The inside of this window contained all small square distractors, while the outside contained all large squares. Total distractor area was constant across conditions. On each trial, a subject's task was to respond whether the figure was displayed in its upright or reflected orientation. Exposure duration was 100 ms. Prior results showed that performance in the all-small distractor case is better than in the all-large distractor case. In the mixed distractor condition, if a subject processes only the part of the image inside the imaginary window, performance should be comparable to that in the all-small distractor condition. Otherwise, performance should be comparable to that in the all-large distractor condition.

Results: There was no significant difference between performance in the mixed distractor and the all-small distractor conditions.

Conclusion: The results suggest that visual display elements beyond a small window have little influence on perception of a degraded figure when exposure duration is brief.

Scheessele, M. R. (2006). Is perception of a degraded figure resistant to spatial context at short exposure? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):762, 762a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/762/, doi:10.1167/6.6.762. [CrossRef]
 IUSB Faculty Research Grant (study #02030)

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.