June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Sensitivity to object-centered relations in LOC
Author Affiliations
  • Irving Biederman
    University of Southern California
  • Mark Lescroart
    University of Southern California
  • Kenneth Hayworth
    University of Southern California
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 1030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.1030
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Irving Biederman, Mark Lescroart, Kenneth Hayworth; Sensitivity to object-centered relations in LOC. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):1030. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.1030.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

From a 200 msec masked presentation of a minimal scene, composed of two separated objects, one above the other, subjects can name both objects and report which one is on top. This capacity poses a challenge to feature hierarchy models (e.g., HMAX) which achieve translation invariant recognition by representing an object as a list of ‘positionless’ features. How are the features of each object kept separate, and how could their relative positions be known? Aggelopoulos & Rolls (2005) suggest a solution. They found that IT receptive fields shrink and shift when viewing scenes, allowing the identity and positions of multiple objects to be simultaneously encoded. Their results, however, leave open whether position is encoded retinotopically (implied by them) or in an object-relative manner. We tested this using a human fMRI-adaptation experiment.

While fixating, subjects were shown a 200ms S1 consisting of two separated objects (e.g., elephant over bus) followed by a 300ms blank and then a 200ms S2 defining one of four trial types: a) “Identical,” the same pair in the same relation and position, b) “Translated,” the same pair in the same relation but in a different position, c) “Relation,” the same pair in the same position but with the relation switched (e.g., bus over elephant), and d) “Object,” one of the previous manipulations where, in addition, one of the objects changed. The task was to detect Object trials.

Results: there was only a small release from adaptation for the Translated condition but a sizeable release for the Relations condition (the opposite ordering is predicted by retinotopic models). Thus LOC may encode an object-relative structural description of scenes. We hypothesize that the same neural mechanism, when engaged on a single object, could form a parts-based structural description supporting our ability to understand shape.

Biederman, I. Lescroart, M. Hayworth, K. (2007). Sensitivity to object-centered relations in LOC [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):1030, 1030a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/1030/, doi:10.1167/7.9.1030. [CrossRef]
 Supported by NSF BCS 04-20794, 04-266415, 05-31177, 06-17699

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.