June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
The role of binocular vision in navigating obstacles
Author Affiliations
  • Kelly Chajka
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Elia Vecellio
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales
  • Mary Hayhoe
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Barbara Gillam
    School of Psychology, University of New South Wales
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.119
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kelly Chajka, Elia Vecellio, Mary Hayhoe, Barbara Gillam; The role of binocular vision in navigating obstacles. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):119. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.119.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Despite a wealth of knowledge about stereoscopic vision, little is known about the role of stereopsis in the control of everyday actions. Work by Patla et al. (Exp Brain Res, 2002) has shown that when stepping over obstacles, foot position is elevated when only monocular vision is available. Our investigation compared monocular and binocular vision when walking over and around obstacles, and also tracked eye movements during the task. Eye movements were recorded from 8 subjects using an RIT wearable eye tracker (ETRA, Babcock & Pelz, 2004). Subjects stepped over two boxes, walked around a table, and returned to the starting point. Subjects performed two monocular and two binocular trials, with the order counterbalanced across subjects. Subjects were overall 11% slower in the monocular condition (600 ms slower around the table, 500 ms slower stepping over obstacles), and elevated the foot approximately 2 cm higher when stepping over obstacles. Fixations on the obstacles accounted for 30% of total gaze duration in each trial, with remaining fixations falling on the floor or wall. However, eye movement patterns were fundamentally different in monocular versus binocular trials. Subjects fixated longer on obstacles (approximately 150–200 ms per obstacle) in monocular vision. In the monocular condition, they also maintained fixation on the floor in order to guide foot placement between the boxes with high frequency (60%), but did this less often in the binocular case (15%). Thus both eye movements and obstacle avoidance are significantly altered when only monocular cues are available. These findings are consistent with increased uncertainty about spatial configuration in monocular vision, resulting from the loss of either stereopsis or other binocular cues.

Chajka, K. Vecellio, E. Hayhoe, M. Gillam, B. (2007). The role of binocular vision in navigating obstacles [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):119, 119a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/119/, doi:10.1167/7.9.119. [CrossRef]
 Supported by ARC RM00362, NIH EY05729, NIH RR 06853

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.