June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
A sequential sampling model of saccadic double-steps in direction
Author Affiliations
  • Casimir Ludwig
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, UK
  • Iain Gilchrist
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, UK
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.140
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Casimir Ludwig, Iain Gilchrist; A sequential sampling model of saccadic double-steps in direction. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):140. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.140.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Sequential sampling models have been used to account for latency distributions of saccades directed to a single target (1). In these models saccade generation is a process of accumulating activity or evidence from a baseline level to a response criterion.

We present an extension of this basic scheme. Saccade direction is coded by an one-dimensional motor map. The units within this map accumulate evidence in favour of a target being in their “response field”. A saccade is generated whenever the activity of one unit reaches criterion. The saccade direction is determined by the direction coded by the winning unit.

The model contains a number of critical features: 1) population coding: the onset of a target activates a large number of units in a graded fashion so that the drift rate is highest for the central unit, but drops-off gradually with increasing distance away from the target; 2) passive decay: the accumulation of activity is leaky; 3) two forms of noise: variability in the input into the motor map triggered by the onset of a target, and variability in the units' activity during accumulation.

The model was tested against empirical data from a double-step study (2). It effectively accounts for: 1) variability in saccade latency and direction under single target conditions; 2) the shape of direction transition functions under double-step conditions; 3) global effect saccades when the angular separation between two target steps is small; 4) the basic gap effect in saccade latency and its lack of influence on the saccadic dead time; 5) the variation in saccadic dead time with increasing target separation.

1. R. H. S. Carpenter, M. L. L. Williams. (1995) Nature. 377, 59-62.

2. C. J. H. Ludwig, J. W. Mildinhall, I. D. Gilchrist. (2007). Journal of Neurophysiology.

Ludwig, C. Gilchrist, I. (2007). A sequential sampling model of saccadic double-steps in direction [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):140, 140a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/140/, doi:10.1167/7.9.140. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.