June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Integrating central and peripheral information during object categorization
Author Affiliations
  • Kimberly MacKenzie
    Department of Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454
  • Yaihara Fortis-Santiago
    Department of Neuroscience, Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454
  • Jozsef Fiser
    Volen Center for Complex Systems and Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.194
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kimberly MacKenzie, Yaihara Fortis-Santiago, Jozsef Fiser; Integrating central and peripheral information during object categorization. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):194. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.194.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Images presented at fixation provide more information to the visual system than images presented parafoveally. However, it is not clear whether it is more beneficial to receive the larger amount of information first in sequential categorical comparisons. Theories based on activation of mental sets, pure information content, or interference make different predictions on the likely outcomes of such tasks. In our study, subjects made same-different category judgments on a large set of briefly appearing pairs of grayscale images of everyday objects, which were presented on a gray background. Each image extended 5 degrees of visual angle, could appear in either the center (C) or corners (S) of the screen for 12.5, 25, or 50 msec, and was followed by a random mask presented for 25 msec. Pairings of position, timing, and category were fully randomized and balanced across trials, and the ISI between the two images within a trial was kept at 12.5msec. Subjects were instructed to fixate at the center of the screen, and their eye movements were monitored. There was a significant advantage in conditions where the central image appeared first and the peripheral image second (C-S) compared to the opposite order (S-C) (t(16)=0.02, p [[lt]] 0.05). However, the relation between stimulus presentation time and categorization performance in the C-S condition was non-monotonic: longer duration was not always paired with better performance. These results rule out pure information-based explanations and suggest that object information received earlier constrains how efficiently information received subsequently is processed in categorization tasks.

MacKenzie, K. Fortis-Santiago, Y. Fiser, J. (2007). Integrating central and peripheral information during object categorization [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):194, 194a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/194/, doi:10.1167/7.9.194. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.