June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Moving objects are perceived later
Author Affiliations
  • Pascal Mamassian
    CNRS & Université Paris 5, France
  • Andrei Gorea
    CNRS & Université Paris 5, France
  • Alan Johnston
    University College London, UK
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.379
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pascal Mamassian, Andrei Gorea, Alan Johnston; Moving objects are perceived later. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):379. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.379.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Moving objects can generate various spatial illusions, such as the effect reported by DeValois and DeValois (1991) where the location of a stationary moving Gabor is misperceived in its direction of motion. One essential component of these illusions is some error in the time at which the moving object is perceived. We present here a method to measure the perceptual delay between moving and stationary objects. Observers were presented with Gabor patches that were modulated by a Gaussian window in both space and time. Two such Gabors were presented in succession and the observer had to estimate the time interval between them (in the order of 1 sec). The observer then had to press a key after a delay that was equal to the previously defined interval. One of the Gabors was stationary whereas the other was moving (drifting carrier at 5 deg/sec). We found that time intervals where the moving Gabor was presented first were systematically estimated to be shorter by about 80 msec compared to trials in which the static Gabor was presented first. In other words, moving Gabors were perceived to occur about 40 msec later than stationary ones. These results could appear counter-intuitive in face of physiological data showing that moving displays are processed faster than stationary ones. We discuss potential models that could account for this delay in perceived motion.

Mamassian, P. Gorea, A. Johnston, A. (2007). Moving objects are perceived later [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):379, 379a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/379/, doi:10.1167/7.9.379. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Chaire of Excellence from the French Ministry of Research
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×