June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Attention and saccades during an active visual task
Author Affiliations
  • Brian Schnitzer
    Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
  • John Wilder
    Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
  • Timothy Gersch
    Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
  • Barbara Dosher
    Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California at Irvine
  • Eileen Kowler
    Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 634. doi:10.1167/7.9.634
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brian Schnitzer, John Wilder, Timothy Gersch, Barbara Dosher, Eileen Kowler; Attention and saccades during an active visual task. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):634. doi: 10.1167/7.9.634.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Selective attention is crucial to natural vision, contributing both to the quality of perceptual experience and to the guidance of saccadic eye movements. A central question is how attention is distributed in real tasks, handling the requirements of both perception and saccades concurrently. We studied attention while counting, an active visual task that can be performed either with or without saccades. Subjects counted 10–19 randomly-distributed dots (16' diam) in an 8 deg diam region while a probe stimulus (tilted Gabor patch, σ=.9 deg) was flashed (65 ms) at one of 4 locations during a randomly selected pause between saccades. During counting, identification of the orientation of even high-contrast Gabors was poor, regardless of whether counting was mediated by saccades or by shifts of attention during steady fixation. Errors in orientation identification were not due to failures to notice the Gabor, since detection and localization were accurate. Orientation identification was far better when comparable patterns of saccades were made without the concurrent counting task and without pre-defined saccadic targets. We also tested a pointing task in which the cognitive load was greater than that of simply looking, but less than that of counting. When subjects pointed to 7–15 randomly-distributed dots using a stylus on a graphics tablet, two showed a loss in Gabor orientation identification comparable to that during counting, two showed a modest loss, and one no loss at all. Taken together, these results show a strong attentional bottleneck at the level of perceptual identification. Active tasks, such as counting or pointing (but not necessarily the saccades themselves), place strict limits on what we can identify during any single fixation pause, but modest limits on the ability to detect, locate and move the eye to new or important objects.

Schnitzer, B. Wilder, J. Gersch, T. Dosher, B. Kowler, E. (2007). Attention and saccades during an active visual task [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):634, 634a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/634/, doi:10.1167/7.9.634. [CrossRef]
 NIH EY15522 NSF DGE0549115

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.