June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Affect and arousal influence the attentional blink
Author Affiliations
  • James T Enns
    University of British Columbia
  • Lisa Jefferies
    University of British Columbia
  • Daniel Smilek
    Waterloo University
  • Eric Eich
    University of British Columbia
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 697. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.697
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      James T Enns, Lisa Jefferies, Daniel Smilek, Eric Eich; Affect and arousal influence the attentional blink. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.697.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Why does listening to music (Olivers & Niewenhius, 2005), being in a positive mood (Olivers & Niewenhius, 2006), employing a relaxation strategy (Smilek et al, 2006) or being distracted by task-irrelevant events (Arend et al, 2006) improve performance on attentionally demanding tasks? These effects have sometimes been attributed to the benefits of positive affect on cognitive performance and at other times to the benefits of dividing attention in tasks where participants tend to overemphasize slow executive processes when rapid automatic processes will do.


What has been overlooked in these discussions is that a participant's emotional state is determined by at least two separable dimensions: one corresponding to whether the state is pleasant or aversive (affect) and another that concerns the level of activation (arousal).


Here we examine the influence of each of these dimensions on performance in a standard attentional blink task. Four emotional states were induced using a music mood induction technique combined with autobiographical memory (Eich & Macauley, 2000): calm (positive, low arousal), happy (positive, high arousal), sad (negative, low arousal), anxious (negative, low arousal).


The results showed that the attentional blink was reduced in the low arousal states relative to the high arousal states. However, this main effect interacted with affect, such that the attentional blink was most severe when participants were highly aroused and negative (anxious) and least severe when they were less aroused (sad). Participants in a positive mood had an intermediate blink that did not differ with arousal (calm, happy).


These results imply (1) that the influence of emotions on attentional control cannot be assessed without taking both affect (positive-negative) and arousal (low, high) into account, and (2) that the influence of “distraction” on attentionally demanding tasks cannot be evaluated without considering the emotional consequences of the distractions.

Enns, J.T. Jefferies, L. Smilek, D. Eich, E. (2007). Affect and arousal influence the attentional blink [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):697, 697a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/697/, doi:10.1167/7.9.697. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.