June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Collaborative search in real-world scenarios
Author Affiliations
  • Kelly A. Malcolmson
    Psychology, University of Waterloo
  • Michael G. Reynolds
    Psychology, Trent University
  • Daniel Smilek
    Psychology, University of Waterloo
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.724
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kelly A. Malcolmson, Michael G. Reynolds, Daniel Smilek; Collaborative search in real-world scenarios. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):724. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.724.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Visual search is often a collaborative process. For instance, pairs of individuals will search luggage during security checks and physicians will collaboratively search for abnormalities in x-ray images. In three experiments we compared the search performance of two people searching together (collaborative condition) with the pooled performance of the two individuals searching separately (nominal condition). In Experiment 1, search in the collaborative condition was compared to search in a nominal condition in which the individuals worked separately and at the same time (i.e., in parallel). In Experiments 2 and 3, search in the collaborative condition was compared to search in a nominal condition in which pairs worked sequentially. Experiment 2 was designed to simulate security search and so any targets found by the first individual in the nominal pair were removed so that the second individual received fewer target items. Experiment 3 was designed to simulate medical diagnosis of X-rays by providing the second searcher in the nominal pairs with the responses given by the first searcher in the pair. In all experiments collaborative pairs were less likely than nominal pairs to correctly detect a target and they were less likely to make false alarms. Additionally, signal detection analyses revealed that collaborative pairs were more sensitive to the presence of the target and had a more conservative response bias than the nominal pairs.

Malcolmson, K. A. Reynolds, M. G. Smilek, D. (2007). Collaborative search in real-world scenarios [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):724, 724a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/724/, doi:10.1167/7.9.724. [CrossRef]
 This research was supported by a grant to D.S., a postdoctoral fellowship to M.G.R. and a graduate scholarship to K.A.M from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC).

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.