June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous covert attention on texture segmentation
Author Affiliations
  • Barbara Montagna
    Psychology, New York University, USA
  • Yaffa Yeshurun
    Psychology, University of Haifa, Israel
  • Marisa Carrasco
    Psychology, New York University, USA, and Neural Science, New York University, USA
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.912
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Barbara Montagna, Yaffa Yeshurun, Marisa Carrasco; Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous covert attention on texture segmentation. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):912. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.912.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Goal: Transient attention, considered to be automatic, improves or impairs performance in a texture segmentation task constrained by spatial resolution (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). Would endogenous (sustained) attention, considered to be voluntary, also impair performance? While keeping stimuli and task constant, we compared the effects of these two types of attention in this texture segmentation task. In this task, performance peaks at mid-peripheral locations, where spatial resolution is optimal for the texture scale, and decreases towards the periphery and center, where spatial resolution is either too low or too high. Transient attention improves performance in the periphery, where spatial resolution is too low, but actually impairs performance at central locations, where spatial resolution is already too high (Yeshurun & Carrasco, 1998). This counterintuitive central attentional impairment indicates that transient attention increases spatial resolution even when it is detrimental to performance, and suggests that it does so by default. If sustained attention is a more flexible mechanism, can it either increase or decrease spatial resolution depending on task demands?

Methods: In a 2-IFC task, observers indicated which of two texture displays contained a target varying in eccentricity. Observers were assigned to either the endogenous or the exogenous attention condition. To manipulate transient attention, peripheral precues appeared adjacent to the target location; to manipulate sustained attention, symbolic precues indicated to the observers where to voluntarily allocate their attention. Attentional effects were evaluated against a neutral cue.

Results: Transient attention impaired performance at central locations (replicating Yeshurun and Carrasco, 1998). In contrast, sustained attention benefited performance at all eccentricities. These results are consistent with the possibility that sustained attention increased spatial resolution where it was too low (periphery), and decreased resolution where it was too high (central locations), and suggest that sustained attention is flexible and adjusts to task demands to optimize performance.

Montagna, B. Yeshurun, Y. Carrasco, M. (2007). Differential effects of endogenous and exogenous covert attention on texture segmentation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):912, 912a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/912/, doi:10.1167/7.9.912. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Grant 25-91551-F5461 from the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Grant 1 R01 EY016200-01A2 from NIH
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×