June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Motion opponency in area MT of the macaque is mostly monocular
Author Affiliations
  • Najib J. Majaj
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
  • Chris Tailby
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
  • J. Anthony Movshon
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.96
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Najib J. Majaj, Chris Tailby, J. Anthony Movshon; Motion opponency in area MT of the macaque is mostly monocular. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):96. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.9.96.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When added, two identical sinusoidal gratings moving in opposite directions appear as a single grating that is flickering in place with no net motion. This is taken as evidence for the existence of motion opponent mechanisms. Single neurons in MT are often inhibited by motion in the anti-preferred direction, indicative of motion opponency.

Most neurons in MT can be driven strongly through either eye. We wondered whether the motion opponency expressed so strongly under monocular conditions still occurs under dichoptic conditions. We recorded from MT neurons in anesthetized, paralyzed macaques. For each neuron, we measured the contrast response function to a preferred grating presented alone, and in the presence of a high contrast grating moving in the opposite direction. The two gratings were either presented in the same eye (monocular) or one to each eye (dichoptic). The anti-preferred stimulus caused the contrast response function to shift rightward on a log-contrast axis, with the effect being largest in the monocular condition. To characterize this effect we fit each contrast response function with a Naka-Rushton equation in order to identify the contrast at which the response of the neuron was half-maximum (c50). In the monocular condition, the anti-preferred grating increased the c50 by a factor of 4, in the dichoptic condition it increased the c50 by a factor of 1.5. Control experiments confirmed that this dichoptic effect represents genuine opponency and not just a dichoptically exerted contrast gain change.

This distinction between dichoptic and monocular motion opponency mirrors recent results obtained psychophysically (Gorea et al. 2001, Vision Res.). Taken together, the psychophysical and physiological results suggest that motion opponency is for the most part generated prior to binocular combination.

Majaj, N. J. Tailby, C. Movshon, J. A. (2007). Motion opponency in area MT of the macaque is mostly monocular [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):96, 96a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/96/, doi:10.1167/7.9.96. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.