August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Style follows content revisited: Evidence from an ERP study
Author Affiliations
  • M. Dorothee Augustin
    Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, K. U. Leuven
  • Helene Fuchs
    Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna
  • Birgit Defranceschi
    Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna
  • Claus-Christian Carbon
    Department of General Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bamberg
  • Florian Hutzler
    Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1080. doi:10.1167/9.8.1080
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Dorothee Augustin, Helene Fuchs, Birgit Defranceschi, Claus-Christian Carbon, Florian Hutzler; Style follows content revisited: Evidence from an ERP study. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1080. doi: 10.1167/9.8.1080.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

To find out what characterizes art from a vision scientist's point of view, it seems important to contrast the processing of style and content in art. While the perception of content (motif) presumably shows strong similarities to normal object and scene perception, style is an aspect that is art specific and that may thus trigger art-specific processing (Augustin, Leder, Hutzler, & Carbon, 2008). Results from a recent study (Augustin et al. 2008) suggest that the processing of content precedes the processing of style, with judgments of similarity for picture pairs reflecting differences in content at shorter presentation times than differences in style. The current investigation tried to find out whether this result is also supported by brain correlates of motor preparations related to explicit classifications of style and content.

We adapted a Dual Choice- Go/No Go paradigm (van Turennout, Hagoort, & Brown, 1998), in which one stimulus dimension determines whether to react or not to react (Go/No Go) and the second dimension determines which hand to react with in Go-trials (left/right). We assessed lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) as brain correlates of hand-specific response preparation. The results suggest information about content to be available earlier than information about style: There was a significant LRP for No-Go trials in cases where style determined the Go/No Go decision and content determined the left/right-decision, but not in those cases where the task assignments of style and content were switched. These results support the finding that style follows content in the processing of art (Augustin et al., 2008), probably reflecting the optimization of the visual system for object and scene perception as opposed to style perception.

Augustin, M. D. Fuchs, H. Defranceschi, B. Carbon, C.-C. Hutzler, F. (2009). Style follows content revisited: Evidence from an ERP study [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1080, 1080a,, doi:10.1167/9.8.1080. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.