August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Visually perceived distances map onto different forms of throwing for adults and children
Author Affiliations
  • John Rieser
    Psychology & Human Development, Peabody, Vanderbilt
  • Gayathri Narasimham
    Psychology & Human Development, Peabody, Vanderbilt
  • Peter Capucilli
    Psychology & Human Development, Peabody, Vanderbilt
  • Aysu Erdemir
    Psychology & Human Development, Peabody, Vanderbilt
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.1147
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      John Rieser, Gayathri Narasimham, Peter Capucilli, Aysu Erdemir; Visually perceived distances map onto different forms of throwing for adults and children. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1147. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.1147.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

This study is about the dynamics and kinematics of visually directed throwing. How is it, we ask, that people look at a target ranging from 1 – 30 meters in distance and know how to try to throw a beanbag to reach the target? For near-by targets, adults and children alike maximize their precision by freezing most degrees of freedom and swinging from only one joint whereas for far away targets they maximize their force by swinging from elbow, shoulder, waist and with a running start. In Study 1 4–6 year old children and adults were asked to look binocularly at targets ranging from 1 to 30 meters away and try to throw a bean bag to reach the target. In Study 2 children and adults were asked to throw again, but without any information about their results. And in Study 3 children and adults were asked to throw after viewing the targets monocularly as well as binocularly. The results show that even the preschool aged children varied the forms to fit with the varying target distances: For near-by targets they tended to maximize precision by swinging from only one joint, whereas for far-away targets they maximize force by swing from elbow, shoulder, waist and with a running start. Binocular viewing did not influence the form of throw or the accuracy of throwing under these conditions.

Rieser, J. Narasimham, G. Capucilli, P. Erdemir, A. (2009). Visually perceived distances map onto different forms of throwing for adults and children [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1147, 1147a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/1147/, doi:10.1167/9.8.1147. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×