August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Quitting rules in visual search
Author Affiliations
  • Riccardo Pedersini
    Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Vidhya Navalpakkam
    California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology
  • Todd Horowitz
    Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Piero Perona
    California Institute of Technology, Computation and Neural Systems, Division of Engineering and Applied Science
  • Jeremy Wolfe
    Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1186. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Riccardo Pedersini, Vidhya Navalpakkam, Todd Horowitz, Piero Perona, Jeremy Wolfe; Quitting rules in visual search. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1186.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

When and why people decide to stop searching for a target that they have not found is an old question. At VSS last year, we demonstrated that payoff matrices can bias observers towards responding that a target is present or absent in visual search. This year, we attempt to explain reaction time and detection rates by considering time-dependent reward-maximization models. Data come from 32 observers, performing a realistic x-ray baggage-screening task. X-ray images of empty bags were filled with semi-transparent, overlapping x-ray images of weapons and other objects. Bags contained 3, 6, 12, or 18 objects. Targets were guns and knives. Observers gained money for correct answers and lost money for incorrect answers. There were 5 possible payoff matrices crossed with two time pressure conditions. In the low pressure condition, observers completed 200 trials at their own pace. In the high pressure condition, they had 15 minutes to search as many bags as they wanted. Payoff matrices were equally effective in low and high pressure conditions. Unsurprisingly, observers became faster under greater time pressure. Moreover, they were close to maximizing expected reward under both conditions. We tested several time-dependent models of decision-making. Drift-diffusion models that decide when accumulating evidence exceeds a target-present or absent threshold failed to explain the data. Models that lack time-penalty (e.g., that decide when expected reward stabilizes) could not explain the effects of time-pressure. Models with linear time-penalty also failed to explain the data. An ideal observer model that maximizes reward rate accounts for: (i) why observers quit search more quickly when targets are rare (i.e., fast “no” responses in target absent trials); (ii) why miss errors are high for rare targets; and (iii) how changing the payoff matrix can make observers quit later and reduce miss errors.

Pedersini, R. Navalpakkam, V. Horowitz, T. Perona, P. Wolfe, J. (2009). Quitting rules in visual search [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1186, 1186a,, doi:10.1167/9.8.1186. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.