August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Preferred greyscale versions of coloured images: Human vs machine
Author Affiliations
  • Marina Bloj
    Bradford Optometry Colour and Lighting Lab, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP,, UK
  • David Connah
    Department of Computer Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
  • Graham Finlayson
    Department of Computer Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 323. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marina Bloj, David Connah, Graham Finlayson; Preferred greyscale versions of coloured images: Human vs machine. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):323. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Each year millions of greyscale reproductions of colour images are made. The majority of these are produced by removing the chromatic information, which leaves a greyscale made by just the achromatic colour variable. One problem with this approach is how to make a greyscales for images that contain equilumiant edges and/or borders in a way that preserves the image content

In our experiment we evaluated some of the more recent algorithmic attempts to tackle the colour-to-greyscale problem, and compared the performance of these methods against greyscale images created manually by human observers. We used an image preference experiment where 10 participants carried out pair-wise comparisons of greyscales produced by 5 different mathematical algorithms and 1 human. Overall, we employed 10 different test images with varying amounts of equiluminant detail, and included images with different levels of content complexity (ranging from outdoor scenes to pie charts).

We find that two algorithms significantly outperform the other computational techniques (including luminance), and that these algorithms both attempt to preserve local colour contrast in the greyscale algorithms. Furthermore, we find that neither of these techniques is significantly preferred over human greyscales. Finally, the interactions between images and algorithm are strong, indicating that image content is important in deciding which is the best greyscale version. These results support the motivation for this research area: there are better ways to convert colour to greyscale than simply using luminance and that images created by human observers are comparable to those produced by algorithms.

Bloj, M. Connah, D. Finlayson, G. (2009). Preferred greyscale versions of coloured images: Human vs machine [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):323, 323a,, doi:10.1167/9.8.323. [CrossRef]
 This work is supported by joint EPSRC grants number EP/E012248/1 and EP/E12159/1.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.