August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Perceptual learning transfers from luminance- to contrast-defined motion
Author Affiliations
  • Taylor Hayes
    Department of Psychology, Ohio State University
  • Alexander Petrov
    Department of Psychology, Ohio State University
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 884. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Taylor Hayes, Alexander Petrov; Perceptual learning transfers from luminance- to contrast-defined motion. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):884.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Distinct brain circuits detect luminance-defined motion (LDM) and contrast-defined motion (CDM). Patterns of transfer of perceptual learning are diagnostic of the amount of overlap between these circuits.

Method: The stimuli were mixtures of dynamic noise and moving texture carriers (speed 10°/sec, duration 400 msec). The textures were patches of static noise filtered with a bandpass filter centered on 1 cycle/deg. CDM stimuli were multiplicative mixtures that contained no net directional Fourier energy (Chubb & Sperling, 1989). LDM stimuli were additive mixtures, titrated to approximate the initial CDM difficulty in a pilot study. Each participant was pre-tested and post-tested on LDM and CDM in a direction discrimination task at two orthogonal directions (-45 vs. -65; 25 vs. 45 deg). Twenty-two participants trained on either LDM or CDM in a constant direction for four sessions, counterbalancing between subjects. To allow for estimation of the psychometric slope, training contained 10 and 6 degree discriminations.

Results: The average d' improved from 1.4 to 2.2 for the LDM group and from 1.2 to 1.8 for the CDM group on the trained direction of motion. There was full transfer to the orthogonal direction in both groups. Critically, there was full transfer from CDM to LDM, and partial transfer (65%) from LDM to CDM.

Conclusion: This substantial amount of transfer suggests substantial overlap between LDM and CDM circuits. Zanker (1999) studied perceptual learning of the global motion of a figure defined by local dot motion. He found very little transfer from primary (local collinear with global) motion to secondary (local orthogonal to global) motion. Our results suggest that the circuits for local LDM and CDM overlap more than the circuits for global primary and secondary motion.

Hayes, T. Petrov, A. (2009). Perceptual learning transfers from luminance- to contrast-defined motion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):884, 884a,, doi:10.1167/9.8.884. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.