August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Detection mechanisms selective to combinations of luminance- and contrast-modulations
Author Affiliations
  • Remy Allard
    Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
  • Patrick Cavanagh
    Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 973. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.973
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Remy Allard, Patrick Cavanagh; Detection mechanisms selective to combinations of luminance- and contrast-modulations. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):973. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.8.973.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

First, we evaluated cross-attribute interactions by measuring detection thresholds for luminance- (LM) and contrast-modulated (CM) Gabor signals embedded in either LM or CM noise. As previously found (Allard and Faubert, VR 2007), masking was attribute-specific: detection thresholds for LM signal were greater in LM than CM noise and vice versa. This suggests independent mechanisms for these two attributes at the detection stage. We then investigated whether there are additional mechanisms that detect specific combinations of the two attributes by measuring detection thresholds when the two were combined in phase (LM+CM) or in counter-phase (LM−CM) and embedded in either LM+CM or LM−CM noise. When the signal and noise were defined by the same combination (both in phase, or both in counter-phase), detection thresholds were greater than when the signal and noise were defined by orthogonal combinations (e.g. in-phase signal, counter-phase noise). Furthermore, when the signal and noise were defined by orthogonal combinations, the detection thresholds were lower than the single attribute detection thresholds (e.g. LM signal, LM noise). Consequently, the combination of LM and CM attributes was detected even though both of the component attributes were subthreshold. This result implies that in addition to the independent LM and CM detection mechanisms, there must be others that respond to specific combinations of these attributes.

Allard, R. Cavanagh, P. (2009). Detection mechanisms selective to combinations of luminance- and contrast-modulations [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):973, 973a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/973/, doi:10.1167/9.8.973. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This research was supported by a FQRNT post-doctoral fellowship to RA and a Chaire d'Excellence grant to PC.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×