May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Visual velocity aftereffects in radial flow: Inherited and unique features
Author Affiliations
  • Marta Iordanova-Maximov
    Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
  • Michael von Grunau
    Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 1034. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marta Iordanova-Maximov, Michael von Grunau; Visual velocity aftereffects in radial flow: Inherited and unique features. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):1034.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A realistic radial flow field contains a range of local velocities, yet global movement is perceived at a single speed. The present study explores the contribution of complex motion sensors to this velocity percept, by recording changes in speed perception and speed sensitivity after adaptation to “scrambled”, or to coherently expanding/contracting large-scale radial flow. A drifting concentric sine grating, conveying motion in depth, was confined to non-abutting display sectors, defining different global patterns of flow. After adapting to a flow pattern in one display region, observers compared its speed to that in a non-adapted region. Velocity aftereffects (VAE-s) from continuous unchanging motion were independent of the pattern of flow: apparent speed was reduced and speed discrimination improved in inverse proportion to the speed of the test. Sensitivity to speed differences, however, was pattern specific - it was superior in expansion. Also, adapted expansion recovered its apparent speed when tested against non-adapted contraction, and direction reversals of the adapter attenuated scrambled, but not coherent VAE-s. No VAE-s were recorded for test motions opposite to the adapted direction. We conclude that higher-order optic flow mechanisms are not uniquely involved in velocity estimation per se, but modulate velocity judgments in response to changes in the ongoing flow. Independent expanding and contracting velocities rival and do not suppress one another when juxtaposed in space or in time. This unique motion opponency appears to be transient and depends on the 3D quality of the flow. It ensures that the speed of approaching objects is correctly perceived, regardless of stimulus history.

Iordanova-Maximov, M. von Grunau, M. (2008). Visual velocity aftereffects in radial flow: Inherited and unique features [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):1034, 1034a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.1034. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.