May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Estimating absolute distances with blurred vision
Author Affiliations
  • Amy A. Kalia
    University of Minnesota Twin-Cities
  • Paul R. Schrater
    University of Minnesota Twin-Cities
  • Gordon E. Legge
    University of Minnesota Twin-Cities
  • Christopher S. Kallie
    University of Minnesota Twin-Cities
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 1047. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amy A. Kalia, Paul R. Schrater, Gordon E. Legge, Christopher S. Kallie; Estimating absolute distances with blurred vision. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):1047.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Humans are able to accurately walk while blindfolded to the location of a previously viewed target, a paradigm called a visually-directed walking task. Task success requires accurately converting visual estimates of absolute distance into walked estimates. However, people underestimate distances when visual depth cues are severely reduced, as when targets are viewed in the dark (Ooi, Wu & He, 2001; Ooi, Wu & He, 2006). One possibility is that underestimation results from combining visual distance information with a prior bias for an upward sloping ground plane that results in perceptually shorter distances to targets (Ooi, et al., 2006). If so, then as visual information becomes unreliable, reliance on prior biases may increase resulting in greater underestimation. The current study investigated this hypothesis by blurring vision to manipulate variability in visual distance estimation. Twelve normally-sighted participants viewed targets in a hallway under three monocular viewing conditions: no blur, low blur (average Snellen acuity of 20/180), and high blur (20/675). Targets were pairs of high-intensity Light-Emitting Diodes located on the floor 3 to 11 meters from the observer. After viewing a target, participants walked to its perceived location blindfolded. Results indicated that the variability of distance estimates increased with both blur and target distance (standard deviations of participants' estimates for the 11 meter target: No Blur: 1.15 m; Low Blur: 1.78 m; High Blur: 2.32 m). Similarly, underestimation increased on average with increasing blur and distance (walked distances to the 11 meter target: No Blur: M = 9.92 m, SE = 0.25 m; Low Blur: M = 8.80 m, SE = 0.49 m; High Blur: M = 8.93 m, SE = 0.56 m). These findings show that blurred vision leads to greater variability and greater underestimation in visual estimates of distances, consistent with an increased reliance on prior biases for object distances.

Kalia, A. A. Schrater, P. R. Legge, G. E. Kallie, C. S. (2008). Estimating absolute distances with blurred vision [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):1047, 1047a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.1047. [CrossRef]
 Supported by The University of Minnesota College of Liberal Arts and Department of Psychology's Graduate Research Partnership Program and NIH grants T32 HD007151 (Interdisciplinary Training Program in Cognitive Science), T32 EY07133-16 (Visual Neuroscience Training Program), and 1 R01 EY017835-01 (Designing Visually Accessible Spaces).

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.