May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Contrast-reversal abolishes perceptual learning
Author Affiliations
  • Zahra Hussain
    McMaster University
  • Patrick Bennett
    McMaster University, and Center for Vision Research, York University
  • Allison Sekuler
    McMaster University, and Center for Vision Research, York University
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 1135. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zahra Hussain, Patrick Bennett, Allison Sekuler; Contrast-reversal abolishes perceptual learning. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):1135.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Identification accuracy of band-limited noise patterns embedded in Gaussian noise increases substantially in a 10AFC task over two training sessions, when the same set of ten patterns is used throughout. Such perceptual learning is stimulus-specific, little improvement transfers to different stimuli with similar spatial attributes. Ostensibly, learning might be invariant for stimulus transformations that leave intact the exemplar identities by preserving the spatial distribution of information in the stimulus. Here, we test the effects of such transformations by measuring the amount of transfer to stimuli reversed in contrast and to stimuli rotated by 180 degrees. Four groups of observers performed the task on two consecutive days. On Day 1, all observers practiced the 10AFC task with a given set of textures. On Day 2 separate groups identified the same textures, different textures, rotated textures, or contrast-reversed textures. In all conditions, stimuli were displayed at one of seven contrasts, in one of three external noise levels, using method of constant stimuli. Results: The effects of contrast reversal and stimulus rotation were the same as replacing the trained stimuli with an unexposed set. The same texture group showed a continuous learning profile across both days, with performance on Day 2 exceeding that measured on Day 1. All other groups' performance dropped sharply on Day 2 relative to performance at the end of Day 1. Although there was some recovery for all three groups, they did not achieve the level of performance of the same texture group on Day 2. This result is particularly surprising for the contrast-reversed stimuli, in which the information distinguishing stimuli is spatially unchanged, unlike the rotated stimuli. Therefore, perceptual learning is sensitive to the presence of stimulus alterations, yet indiscriminate as to the type of stimulus transformation.

Hussain, Z. Bennett, P. Sekuler, A. (2008). Contrast-reversal abolishes perceptual learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):1135, 1135a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.1135. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.