May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Random and systematic effects of neural noise on low-level and high-level pattern vision
Author Affiliations
  • Timothy D. Sweeny
    Department of Psychology, Northwestern University
  • Marcia Grabowecky
    Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, and Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University
  • Ken A. Paller
    Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, and Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University
  • Satoru Suzuki
    Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, and Institute for Neuroscience, Northwestern University
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/8.6.593
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Timothy D. Sweeny, Marcia Grabowecky, Ken A. Paller, Satoru Suzuki; Random and systematic effects of neural noise on low-level and high-level pattern vision. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):593. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.6.593.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The visual system never perfectly represents the physical world. Rather, neural noise sometimes perturbs perception of simple shapes, especially when they are viewed briefly. Neural noise can randomly influence perception, but may also systematically distort perception, as in feature exaggeration. We examined these random and systematic influences of neural noise on curvature perception when short contour segments were presented alone (primarily involving low-level processing) and when they were embedded as the mouths within schematic faces (involving high-level object processing). Inverted-and-scrambled versions of the faces were used to control for a potential effect of crowding. To detect perceptual noise with high sensitivity, we used a procedure developed by Baldassi, Megna, and Burr (2006) in which brief presentations were comprised of an array of straight segments with either one curved target or no curved targets. The task was to report the curvature of the segment that appeared most curved using a magnitude-estimation procedure. Random noise was estimated as the variance of the reported curvatures for displays where curved targets were absent. Curvature exaggeration was measured as the average difference between the reported curvature and the actual curvature of the target. Random noise in curvature perception was greater when segments were presented within faces or inverted-scrambled faces compared to when they were presented alone, suggesting that crowding increased random perceptual noise. Curvature exaggeration, in contrast, was substantial when segments were presented alone or within inverted-scrambled faces, whereas exaggeration was weakest (reduced by ∼40%) when segments were presented within faces. This pattern of curvature exaggeration may reflect the possibility that systematic exaggeration is beneficial in low-level processing because a unique feature may become more salient, but could be harmful in high-level processing because perceptual exaggeration of facial expressions may lead to socially inappropriate responses.

Sweeny, T. D. Grabowecky, M. Paller, K. A. Suzuki, S. (2008). Random and systematic effects of neural noise on low-level and high-level pattern vision [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):593, 593a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/593/, doi:10.1167/8.6.593. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant EY14110 and National Science Foundation grant BCS0643191.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×