May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Development of optimal integration for self-motion and landmark cues in human navigation
Author Affiliations
  • Marko Nardini
    Dept Psychology, University College London, UK
  • Peter Jones
    School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK
  • Rachael Bedford
    Dept Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
  • Oliver Braddick
    Dept Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 832. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marko Nardini, Peter Jones, Rachael Bedford, Oliver Braddick; Development of optimal integration for self-motion and landmark cues in human navigation. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):832.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Mammalian navigation depends both on visual landmarks and on self-generated (e.g. vestibular and proprioceptive) cues that signal the organism's movement from one moment to the next. Previous studies have found that under conflict, landmarks can reset estimates of self-motion, or be integrated with them. We asked whether humans combine these cues optimally, given their relative reliability, and whether children, who use both kinds of information from a young age, combine them as adults do. In a dark arena with illuminated peripheral landmarks, participants attempted to return an object to its original place, given (i) non-visual self-motion information only, (ii) visual landmarks only, or (iii) both. In the “self-motion only” condition, participants responded in the dark. In the “landmarks only” condition, participants were disoriented by turning before responding. In the “both” condition landmarks were available and participants were not disoriented. In a further “conflict” condition (iv), landmarks were covertly rotated by 15°, creating a conflict between self-motion and landmark information that enabled us to assess how the two were weighted relative to each other. When self-motion and landmark information conflicted, adults and children aged 4 – 8 years weighted them optimally given their relative reliability. However, only adults were Bayes-optimal in reducing variability in their location estimates when both information sources were available and consistent, whereas children's variability was not lower than with either information source alone. These results indicate that in human navigation, development of individual representational systems greatly precedes development of the capacity to combine multiple sources of spatial information optimally within a common reference frame. Further, optimal weighting of conflicting spatial cues precedes ability to combine them to reduce variance.

Nardini, M. Jones, P. Bedford, R. Braddick, O. (2008). Development of optimal integration for self-motion and landmark cues in human navigation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):832, 832a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.832. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.