May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Optimality of saccadic decisions under risk
Author Affiliations
  • Martin Stritzke
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany
  • Julia Trommershäuser
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany
  • Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Giessen, Germany
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 918. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Martin Stritzke, Julia Trommershäuser, Karl R. Gegenfurtner; Optimality of saccadic decisions under risk. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):918.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It has been shown that humans have the ability to take into account the consequences of hand movements in an optimal fashion. Here we studied saccadic eye movements in a rapid fixation task that provided explicit rewards and penalties for the saccade endpoint. Subjects were instructed to make a saccade towards a color coded target region as quickly as possible while trying to avoid a nearby penalty region. Saccades into the target won points; saccades into the penalty could yield a loss. Subjects' task was to win as high a score as possible. Subjects' scores were compared to optimal scores which were calculated taking into account each observer's movement endpoint variability, similar to a recent model of optimal movement planning under risk. 3 paradigms (‘gap’, ‘no gap’ and ‘overlap’) which lead to different saccadic latencies were used. Results show that scores in the ‘gap’ experiment are poor in trials with the shortest latencies (120 ms – 140 ms) but improve significantly with longer latencies. In the ‘no gap’ experiment, latencies were on average 20 ms longer, in the ‘overlap’ experiment on average 55 ms longer than in the ‘gap’ experiment. However, scores at a given latency level remained largely unaffected by the experimental paradigm. This shows that planning of the saccade does not interfere with other processes that occur before the eye starts moving, e.g. disengaging fixation. We conclude that, with additional time of about 40 ms – 100 ms for processing, saccades can be planned and executed optimally in some conditions. This is in line with the idea that processing of reward related information - which is believed to be encoded in area LIP - takes additional time. This time does not seem to be available in trials with very short latencies.

Stritzke, M. Trommershäuser, J. Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Optimality of saccadic decisions under risk [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):918, 918a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.918. [CrossRef]
 Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy-Noether-Programm, Grant TR 528/1-3) to MS and JT.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.