Purchase this article with an account.
Leanna Cruikshank, Jeremy Caplan, Anthony Singhal; Event-related potential (ERP) reflections of perceptual requirements during the planning of delayed action. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.1065.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
Kinematic studies have robustly shown that delayed hand actions involve slower and less accurate movements compared to immediate, visually guided actions. Furthermore, converging evidence from neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies suggest that visual perceptual brain mechanisms in the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) are critically recruited during delayed hand actions. In this study we sought to further investigate these issues by directly comparing the amount of perception-based neural activity during the planning phase of visually guided and delayed actions. To this end, twelve paid volunteers were auditorily cued to perform a reaching task to circular targets at varying locations on a nineteen-inch touch sensitive monitor. In the visually guided condition, the targets remained visible for 300 milliseconds after the onset of the auditory movement cue. In the delayed condition, the targets disappeared from view at the same time as the auditory movement cue. We collected scalp recorded event-related potential (ERP) data from 256 electrodes during both conditions of the task, and focused our analysis on the neural activity during the action planning phase of each trial. The behavioral data showed that, as expected, movement time (MT) was slower in the delayed condition compared to the visually guided condition. Moreover, the ERP data showed that the sensory P1 response over occipital electrodes was equivalent in both conditions; and most importantly, the object recognition N170 response was larger during the planning phase of the delayed action condition compared to the visually guided action condition. This effect was robustly observed at 22 electrodes over temporal-occipital sites in both hemispheres. These data suggest that the planning of delayed actions relies more heavily on perception-based information than visually guided action. Furthermore, this difference is not reflected in early visual processing, but involves higher-order perception likely associated with regions in the inferior-temporal cortex.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only