August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Learning internal models for motion extrapolation
Author Affiliations
  • Paul Schrater
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
    Department of Computer Sci. and Eng., University of Minnesota
  • Nate Powell
    Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1104. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Paul Schrater, Nate Powell; Learning internal models for motion extrapolation. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1104.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Prediction and extrapolation form key problems in many perceptual tasks, as exemplified by tracking object motion with occlusion: an object moves along a variable path before disappearing and a prediction of where the object will reemerge at a specified distance beyond the point of occlusion is made. In general, predicting the trajectory of an object during occlusion requires an internal model of the object's motion to extrapolate future positions given the observed trajectory. In recent work (Fulvio, Maloney & Schrater, VSS2009), we showed that people naturally adopt one of two kinds of generic motion extrapolation models in the absence of feedback (i.e. no learning)- a constant acceleration model (producing quadratic extrapolation) or a constant velocity model (producing linear extrapolation). How such predictive models are learned is an open question. To address this question, we had subjects extrapolate the motion of a swarm of sample points generated by random walks from two different families of dynamics - one periodic and one quadratic. For both motion models, the ideal observer is a Kalman filter, and we compute normative learning predictions via a Bayesian ideal learner. Simulation results from the ideal learner predict that learning motion models will depend on several factors, including differential predictions of the motion models, consistency of the motion type across trials and limited noise. To test these predictions, subjects performed a motion extrapolation task that involved positioning a “bucket” with a mouse to capture the object as it emerged from occlusion, and feedback was given at the end of each trial. While subject performance was less than ideal, we provide clear evidence that they adapt their internal motion models toward the generative process in a manner consistent with statistical learning.

Schrater, P. Powell, N. (2010). Learning internal models for motion extrapolation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1104, 1104a,, doi:10.1167/10.7.1104. [CrossRef]
 ONR N 00014-07-1-0937.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.