August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
The objects behind the scenes: TMS to area LO disrupts object but not scene categorization
Author Affiliations
  • Caitlin Mullin
    Centre for Vision Research and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto
  • Jennifer Steeves
    Centre for Vision Research and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.1273
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Caitlin Mullin, Jennifer Steeves; The objects behind the scenes: TMS to area LO disrupts object but not scene categorization. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1273. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.1273.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Many influential theories of scene perception are object centered (Biederman, 1981) suggesting that scenes are processed by extension of object processing in a bottom-up fashion. However, an alternative approach to scene processing is that the global gist of a scene can be processed in a top-down manner without the need for first identifying its component objects (Oliva & Torralba, 2001). This suggests that global aspects of a scene may be processed prior to the identification of individual objects. Evidence from a patient with object agnosia and bilateral damage to lateral occipital (LO) cortex, an area associated with object processing (Grill-Spector et al., 2001), also suggests that scene categorization can operate independently of object perception (Steeves et al., 2004). We asked whether or not temporary interruption to area LO in neurologically-intact controls with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) impairs object and scene processing. Participants categorized greyscale images of objects and scenes as ‘natural’ or ‘man-made’. Subsequently, we targeted area LO, which had been functionally defined with fMRI, and participants underwent five minutes of rTMS. Immediately following, they completed another version of the object and scene categorization task. Preliminary results show that rTMS to area LO impairs categorization of objects but not scenes. This suggests that the global gist used to rapidly categorize scenes remains intact despite an interruption to object processing brain regions.

Mullin, C. Steeves, J. (2010). The objects behind the scenes: TMS to area LO disrupts object but not scene categorization [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1273, 1273a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/1273, doi:10.1273/10.7.1273. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Canada Foundation for Innovation, NSERC to JKES and OGSST to CRM.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×