August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Blur clarified
Author Affiliations
  • Andrew Watson
    NASA Ames Research Center
  • Albert Ahumada
    NASA Ames Research Center
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1385. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Watson, Albert Ahumada; Blur clarified. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1385.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A review of the literature on blur detection and discrimination reveals a large collection of data, a few theoretical musings, but no predictive model. Among the key empirical findings are a “dipper” shaped function relating blur increment threshold to pedestal blur, as well as a nonlinear effect of luminance contrast. We have found that these phenomena and others are accounted for by a simple model in which discrimination is based on the energy of differences in visible contrast. Visible contrast is computed from the luminance waveform, as modified by local light adaptation and local contrast masking. The energy of the difference between two visible contrast waveforms, within a pooling aperture, determines threshold. This model can also predict detection thresholds for one dimensional waveforms such as Gabor signals. When fit to the ModelFest Gabors, it gives reasonable predictions for classic blur detection and discrimination data as well.

Watson, A. Ahumada, A. (2010). Blur clarified [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1385, 1385a,, doi:10.1167/10.7.1385. [CrossRef]
 Supported by NASA's Space Human Factors Engineering Project, WBS 466199.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.