August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Feature binding across visual and manual domains: Evidence from a VSTM study
Author Affiliations
  • Raju Sapkota
    Vision & Eye Research Unit, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
    Department of Optometry & Ophthalmic Dispensing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK
  • Shahina Pardhan
    Vision & Eye Research Unit, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
  • Ian van der Linde
    Vision & Eye Research Unit, Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.
    Department of Computing & Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.766
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Raju Sapkota, Shahina Pardhan, Ian van der Linde; Feature binding across visual and manual domains: Evidence from a VSTM study. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):766. https://doi.org/10.1167/10.7.766.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 

In this study, binding in visual short-term memory (VSTM) across visual and manual domains was investigated. Six human observers performed a yes-no recognition task for object appearance in three experimental conditions (fully counterbalanced) in which unfamiliar, nonverbal 1/f noise discs served as stimuli. In the memory display, four stimuli (each subtending 2 deg) were presented sequentially (each for 850ms) at random spatial positions. Following a 1000ms blank interval, a test stimulus was presented. In condition 1, observers executed hand movements (spatial tapping) during the memory display by touching a pointer on a graphics tablet at a position corresponding to the screen coordinate of each stimulus as it appeared. The test stimulus was presented at one of the coordinates used in the preceding memory display. Condition 2 was identical to condition 1, except that spatial tapping was not performed. In condition 3, both memory and test stimuli were presented at (different) random coordinates; observers performed spatial tapping during the memory display (like condition 1), except that the positions of test stimuli did not correspond to preceding hand/screen positions. In all three experimental conditions, the cursor was invisible. Observers completed a training session in which the cursor was visible to associate graphics tablet coordinates with screen coordinates. Performance, measured in d′, was significantly greater in condition 1 than in conditions 2 [F(1,5)=20.35, p<0.01] and 3 [F(1,5)=10.14, p=0.02]. Performance was not significantly different between conditions 2 and 3 [F(1,5)=4.54, p=0.09]. These findings suggest that a spatially correlated manual action facilitates VSTM, providing evidence that perception and action bind across representational domains to associate relevant stimulus properties, consistent with event file theory (Hommel, 1998; 2004). Furthermore, given that our stimuli are unlikely to accrue VLTM support, these findings support the notion that visuo-manual binding occurs even where semantic and associative VLTM cues are minimized.

 
Sapkota, R. Pardhan, S. van der Linde, I. (2010). Feature binding across visual and manual domains: Evidence from a VSTM study [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):766, 766a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/766, doi:10.1167/10.7.766. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×